Hello,
I have been studying Chaldean Numerology and just want confirmation on my calculations.
birth name Denise Marie Cimino 12/3 not good
current name Denise Moore 12/3 not good
birth 12/08/1964 the 3 vibration is the best for a #8 (understanding 12 is not fortunate)
The best name change would be to a fortunate 3 or 2 vibration
However I am curious what would a 8 vibration name bring? I am thinking not good.
name
Re: name
Miss why are you using single vibrations, Chaldean uses only compound vibrations. Some numerologists use single, but that is lame, it is useless if you ask me
Denise Marie Cimino
single vibrations are very god, total is bad (57)
Total is 3 , so that is good, but it is not a good vibration.
57 is same as 30
This is a number of thoughtful deduction, retrospection, and mental superiority over one's fellows, but as it seems to belong completely to the mental plane, the persons it represents, are likely to put all material things on one side not because they have to, but because they wish to do so. For this reason it is neither fortunate nor unfortunate, for either depends on the mental outlook of the person it represents. It can be all powerful, but it is just as often indifferent according to the will or desire of the person.
So I would suggest making a total 21, using only 1 name, or use total 1 or 9. There are many lucky total vibrations 9 or 1.
Denise Marie Cimino
single vibrations are very god, total is bad (57)
Total is 3 , so that is good, but it is not a good vibration.
57 is same as 30
This is a number of thoughtful deduction, retrospection, and mental superiority over one's fellows, but as it seems to belong completely to the mental plane, the persons it represents, are likely to put all material things on one side not because they have to, but because they wish to do so. For this reason it is neither fortunate nor unfortunate, for either depends on the mental outlook of the person it represents. It can be all powerful, but it is just as often indifferent according to the will or desire of the person.
So I would suggest making a total 21, using only 1 name, or use total 1 or 9. There are many lucky total vibrations 9 or 1.
Johny Cusante - Owner - www.professionalnumerology.com
-
catclaws123
- Posts: 3
- Joined: 05 Apr 2009 01:14
Re: name
O.K O.K,
I do see I should have used the first compound #. For some time now I have contemplated changing the spelling to my first name by dropping an E so I get Deniss which gives me the 21/3. I am mostly known by my first name. Although I am wodering if I use my full name with the new spelling Deniss Moore (for legal matters) and it adds up to 46/1 is it a conflicting vibration with my 8 birthdate?
I do see I should have used the first compound #. For some time now I have contemplated changing the spelling to my first name by dropping an E so I get Deniss which gives me the 21/3. I am mostly known by my first name. Although I am wodering if I use my full name with the new spelling Deniss Moore (for legal matters) and it adds up to 46/1 is it a conflicting vibration with my 8 birthdate?
Re: name
Hi
I am answering only basic questions, for more detailed info you need to order reading.
I am answering only basic questions, for more detailed info you need to order reading.
Johny Cusante - Owner - www.professionalnumerology.com
Re: name
Hi there ,Good day 
Would like know, my name
HARESH JANARDHAN
where by my birth date 19.12.1986
Base chaldean readings : Haresh = 21 ; Janardhan = 25 (Usually for official)
But with whole would be = 46 .would that be alright to stick to this name
Your thought on this? Cause my base on my own study Psychic No. 1; Destiny too No.1 (1,1)
Whats your view on this is that bad or necessary to change..?
& would say a green light for me If others to call me... Hariee = 19(casual name)
& what if they jsut call me Haresh = 21 (but i believe Hariee has the better vibration)
Would be grateful if could help out give ur picture on it.
Thanks
Would like know, my name
HARESH JANARDHAN
where by my birth date 19.12.1986
Base chaldean readings : Haresh = 21 ; Janardhan = 25 (Usually for official)
But with whole would be = 46 .would that be alright to stick to this name
Your thought on this? Cause my base on my own study Psychic No. 1; Destiny too No.1 (1,1)
Whats your view on this is that bad or necessary to change..?
& would say a green light for me If others to call me... Hariee = 19(casual name)
& what if they jsut call me Haresh = 21 (but i believe Hariee has the better vibration)
Would be grateful if could help out give ur picture on it.
Thanks
Re: name
I would suggest a change, your last name is 25 and that is a bad vibration in Chaldean, and then you have challenge numbers in Pythagorean too.
Johny Cusante - Owner - www.professionalnumerology.com
Re: name
I have 2 questions from all the conversations here.
1: For Haresh why do you say that 25 does not have good vibrations. His total name is 46 and that is what matters? correct?
2. How does 30=57? I never read this in Chaldean. In Chaldean it says for any compound additions above 52 you bring it down to single numbers? correct?
1: For Haresh why do you say that 25 does not have good vibrations. His total name is 46 and that is what matters? correct?
2. How does 30=57? I never read this in Chaldean. In Chaldean it says for any compound additions above 52 you bring it down to single numbers? correct?